Received: 10-05-2022
Accepted: 27-09-2022
DOI:
Views
Downloads
How to Cite:
Evaluation of the Useability of Morphological Indicators of Otoliths forIdentification ofsome Marine Fish Species
Keywords
Otolith, species identification, discriminant function analysis, measurement index - BSI, shape indices - ShI
Abstract
In the presentpaper, we evaluate the ability to identify some marine fish species based on the analysis of morphological otoliths. Thestudy collected 180 sagitta of 10 species, then photographed, measured the basic sizeindices (BSI), and calculated the shape indices (ShI) in program R. Data were analyzed by standard statistical methods: ANOVA, Discriminant function analysis(DFA), and Canonical Analysis. The results of the analysis confirmed the possibility of using measurements of otolith morphology for the purpose of species identification. DFA based on basic measurements BSI could identify threespecies with 100% accuracy (18/18); threespecies with high accuracy from 77% to 95%. Based on the ShI shape index, 02 species can be identified with 100% accuracy (18/18); 03 species achieved high accuracy from 77% to 95%. When combining the basic measurements of BSI and ShI by DFA, the overall accuracy of the species was increased by 81.11%. The number of species with 100% accurate identification was increased to 4 species; 04 species achieved a high classification level from 77% to 95%.Result of this study showed that combiningBSI and ShI gave higest accuracy.
References
Allen G.R., Steene R., Humann P. & Deloach N. (2003). Reef Fish Identification Tropical Pacific. New World Publications, Inc.
Bani A., Poursaeid S. &Tuset V.M. (2013). Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in three species of south Caspian gobies Journal of Fish Biology. 82: 1321-1332.
Begg G.A., Friedland K.D. & Pearce J.B. (1999). Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: anoverview. Fisheries Research. 43: 1-8.
Campana S.E. (2004). Photographic atlas of fish otoliths of the Northwest atlantic ocean. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. No 133. NRC Research. press. https://doi.org/10.1139/9780660191089
Falini S., Fermani S., Vanzo M. &Miletic G. (2005). Influence on the formation of aragonite or vaterite by otolith macromolecules. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. pp. 162-167.
Froese R. & Pauly D. (2022). FishBase - World Wide Web electronic publication. Retrieved from www.fishbase.se on Jan 18, 2022.
Hà Phước Hùng & Hồ Kim Lợi (2013). Nghiên cứu hình thái đá tai của họ cá Chép (Cyprinidae) phân bố ở An Giang và Cần Thơ. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Cần Thơ. 26: 50-54.
He T., Cheng J., Qin J., Li Y. & Gao T. (2017). Comparative analysis of otolith morphology in three species of Scomber. Ichthyological Research. 65: 192-201.
Kimura S., Imamura H., Nguyen V.Q. & Pham T.D. (2018). Fishes of Ha Long Bay, the natural heritage site in northern Vietnam. Fisheries Research Laboratory, Mie University, Shima, Japan.
Levia D., Andreolib M.G., ArnericE., GiannetticG. &RizzoaP. (1994). Otolith reading as a tool for stock identification. Fisheries Research. 20(2):97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)90077-9.
Libungan L.A. & Pálsson S. (2015). ShapeR: An R package to study otolith shape variation among fish populations. PLoSOne. 10(3): Article e0121102. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0121102 on Feb 18, 2022.
Lieske E. & Meyers R. (1996). Coral Reef Fishes (Caribbean, Indian Ocean and facific Ocean including the Red Sea). Princeton University Presss, America.
Lin C., Gracia B.D., Pierotti M.E.R., Andrews A.H., Griswold K. & O’Dea A. (2019). Reconstructing reef fish communities using fish otoliths in coral reef sediments. PLoSOne. 14(6): Article e0218413. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0218413on Jan 26, 2022.
Lin Y.J. & Al-Abdulkader K. (2019). Identification of fish families and species from the western Arabian Gulf by otolith shape analysis and factors affecting the identification process. Marine and Freshwater Research. 70: 1818-1827.
Nakabo T. (2002). Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species, English. Tokai University Press, Japan.
Oliveira A.M.& Farina M. (1996). Vaterite, calcite and aragonite in the otoliths of three species of piranha. Naturwissenschaften. 83:133-135.
Portnoy D.S. & Gold J.R.(2013).Finding Geographic Population Structure in Marine Fish Species with High Gene Flow. Proceedings of the 65thGulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute. 65: 384-389
Salimi N., Loh K.H., Kaur Dhillon S. & Chong V.C. (2016). Fully-automated identification of fish species based on otolith contour: using short-time Fourier transform and discriminant analysis (STFT-DA). PeerJ 4:e1664. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1664 on Jan 18, 2022.
Tuset V.M.,Lombarte A. & Assis C.A. (2008). Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. Scientia Marina. 72(1): 7-198.
Tuset V.M., Lozano I., Gonzalez J., Pertusa J. & Garcia-Diaz M. (2003) Shape indices to identify regional differences in otolith morphology of comber, Serranus cabrilla(L., 1758). Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 19: 88-93.
Vu Quyet Thanh & Kartavtsev Yu. Ph. (2017). Morphometric differences between two smelt species, Hypomesus japonicus(Brevoort, 1856) and H. nipponensis(McAllister, 1963) (Pisces: Osmeridae) from the Northwestern part of the Sea of Japan. Russian Journal of Marine Biology.43(6):436-446.
Vu Quyet Thanh & Kartavtsev Yu. Ph. (2021). Otolith shape analysis and its utilily for identification of two smelt species, Hypomesus japonicusand H. nipponensis(Osteichthyes, Osmeridae) from the northwestern Sea of Japan with inferences in stock discrimination of H. japonicus. Russian Journal of Marine Biology. 46(6): 431-440.
Vũ Quyết Thành, Trần Văn Đạt, Phùng Văn Giỏi, Trần Văn Hướng & Trần Công Thịnh (2022). Mô tả hình thái đá tai (sagittal) của một số loài cá rạn san hô tại vùng biển Cát Bà và Thổ Chu. Tạp chí Khoa học Nông nghiệp Việt Nam. 20(5): 603-613.