Effect of Different Dietary Protein Levels on Growth and Reproductive Characteristics of Artemia franciscana Vinh Chau

Received: 20-08-2015

Accepted: 22-01-2016

DOI:

Views

4

Downloads

0

Issue: Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016)

Section:

NÔNG HỌC

How to Cite:

Han, D., Hoa, N., & Anh, N. (2024). Effect of Different Dietary Protein Levels on Growth and Reproductive Characteristics of Artemia franciscana Vinh Chau. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(1), 1–9. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/252

Effect of Different Dietary Protein Levels on Growth and Reproductive Characteristics of Artemia franciscana Vinh Chau

Duong Thi My Han (*) 1 , Nguyen Van Hoa 1 , Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh 1

  • 1 Khoa Thủy sản, Trường Đại học Cần Thơ

    • Keywords

    Artemia franciscana, dietary protein, growth, lifespan, reproduction, survival

    Abstract


    This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary protein levels in formulated feeds on survival, growth and reproductive characteristics of Artemia franciscanaVinh Chau in laboratory conditions. Experiment consisted of 7 feeding treatments including of commercial shrimp feed No. 0 (control feed) and 6 formulated feeds containing 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45% protein. The experimental process was divided into two phases (1) Communal culture,from day 0 until Artemiareachessexual maturity to determine survival and growth. (2) Individual culture,Artemiacouples were reared in 50-ml Falcon tubes to record their reproductive characteristics and life span. After 14 days of culture, survival of Artemiawas not affected by the feeding treatments, varying in the range of 87.2-95.4%; and the total length of Artemiaattainedbetween 7.00 and 8.04mm, of which the treatments from 25% to 35% protein had significantly higher values (P> 0.05) compared to other feeding treatments. The lifespan of Artemia females wassimilar among feeding treatments (44.6-48.6 days). The reproductive period, total brood number and total offspring per Artemiafemale in the 30 and 35% protein treatments were significantly higher (P> 0.05) than the control, 20% and 45% protein treatments. These results indicated that formulated feed containing 30 to35% protein could be suitable feed for growth and reproductive performance of Artemia franciscana.

    References

    FAO(2013). On-farm feedingand feed management in aquaculture. Hasan, M.R. Hasan and New M.B(Eds.). FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 578. Rome, 90pp.

    Balasundaram C. and Kumaraguru A. K. (1987). Laboratory studies on growth and reproduction of Artemia (Tuticorin Strain). In:Artemia Research and its Applications. Vol. 3. Ecology, Culturing, Use in aquaculture. P. Sorgeloos, D. A. Bengtson, W. Decleir, and E. Jaspers (Eds.). Universa Press, Wetteren, Belgium,pp. 331-338.

    Boyd, C.E. (1998). Water quality for pond Aquaculture. Department of Fisheries and Applied Aquacultures. Auburn University. Alabama 36849 USA.

    D’ Agostino, A.S. (1980). The vital requimentts of Artemia, physiology and nutrition. In:The Brine Shrimp, Vol. 2, Physiology, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology.

    Evjemo O. J. and Olsen Y. (1999). Effect of food concentration on the growth and production rate of Artemia franciscana feeding on algae (T. iso). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 242(2):273-296.

    Fábregas, J., Otero, A., Morales, E.D., Arredondo-Vega, B.O., Patino, M. (1998). Modification ofthe nutritive value ofPhaeodactylum tricornutumforArtemiasp. In semicontinuous cultures. Aquaculture,169:167-176.

    Huynh Thanh Toi, Boeckx, P., Sorgeloos, P., Bossier, P. and Van Stappen, G. (2013). Bacteria contribute to Artemia nutrition in algae-limited conditions: A laboratory study. Aquaculture,7:388-391.

    Lora-Vilchis, M.C., Cordero-Esquivel, B. and Voltolina, D. (2004). Growth of Artemia franciscanafed Isochrysissp. and Chaetoceros muelleriduring its early life stages. Aquaculture Research,35:1086-1091.

    Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Anh, QuảngThị Mỹ Duyên và Nguyễn Văn Hòa(2014). Khảo sát các yếu tố kỹ thuật và hiệu quả tài chính mô hình nuôi Artemia ở tỉnh Sóc Trăng và Bạc Liêu. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Cần Thơ,32:100-112.

    Nguyễn Văn Hòa(1993). Effect of environment conditions on the quantitative feed requirements of the brine shrimp A. franciscana(Kellogg). University ofGhent. Thesis submitted in Partial fulfill of the requirements for the Academic Degree of Master of Science in Aquaculture.

    Nguyễn Thị Kim Phượng và Nguyễn Văn Hòa (2013). Ảnh hưởng của khẩu phần thức ăn lên sinh trưởng và một số chỉ tiêu sinh sản của Artemia franciscana(dòng Vĩnh Châu). Tạp chí khoa học Đại học Cần Thơ, 26:34-42.

    Nguyễn Văn Hòa, Nguyễn Thị Hồng Vân, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Anh, Phạm Thị Tuyết Ngân, Huỳnh Thanh Tới, Trần Hữu Lễ(2007). Artemia:Nghiên cứu và ứng dụng trong nuôi trồng thủy sản. Nhà xuất bản Nông Nghiệp.

    Sorgeloos, P. (1980). Life history of the brine shrimp Artemia. In:The brine shrimp Artemia, Proceeding of the International Symposium on the brine shrimp Artemia salina. Corpus Chritis, Texa, USA, August 20-23, 1979. Volume 1: Morphology, Genetics, Radiobiology, Toxicology, G. Persoone, P. Sorgeloos, O. Roels and E. Jaspers(Eds.), Universa Press, Wettern, Belgium, pp.19-22.

    Sorgeloos, P., Lavens, P., Lesger, P., Tackaert, W., Versichele, D.(1986).Manual for the culture and use of brine shrimp Artemia in aquaculture. Artemia Reference Center. Faculty of Agriculture. State University of Ghent, Belgium.

    Trần Thị Thanh Hiền và Nguyễn Anh Tuấn(2009). Dinh dưỡng và thức ăn thủy sản. Nhà xuất bản Nông nghiệp. 191 trang.

    Wurtsbaugh, W.A. and Z.M. Gliwicz. (2001). Limnological control of brine shrimp population dynamics and cyst production in the Great Salt Lake, Utah. Hydrobiologia, 466: 119-132.