Initial Research on the Effects of Two Chemical Products of Duponts Prevathon 5SC and Radiant 60SC on the Rate of Prevention of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) onMaize

Received: 11-02-2020

Accepted: 17-08-2020

DOI:

Views

2

Downloads

0

Issue: Vol. 18 No. 12 (2020)

Section:

NÔNG HỌC

How to Cite:

Loan, D., Hanh, V., Ha, N., Thuy, H., Ha, T., & Liet, V. (2024). Initial Research on the Effects of Two Chemical Products of Duponts Prevathon 5SC and Radiant 60SC on the Rate of Prevention of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) onMaize. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(12), 1132–1138. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/759

Initial Research on the Effects of Two Chemical Products of Duponts Prevathon 5SC and Radiant 60SC on the Rate of Prevention of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) onMaize

Duong Thi Loan (*) 1 , Vu Thi Bich Hanh 1 , Nguyen Van Ha 1 , Hoang Thi Thuy 1 , Tran Thi Thanh Ha 1 , Vu Van Liet 1

  • 1 Viện Nghiên cứu và Phát triển cây trồng

    • Keywords

    Fall Armyworm, Dupont Prevathon 5SC, Spinetoram, spray repeat, insecticide efficiency

    Abstract


    This study aimed to use two insecticidal products, Dupont Prevathon 5SC and Radiant 60SC,to manage the infestation of the Fall Armyworm on maize. These products have shown the highest effective insecticide, less toxic to humans and the environment. The experiments were conducted at the Plant Research and Development Institute in the Autumn-Winter 2019, using two low-toxic insecticides: Dupont Prevathon 5SC (active ingredient Chlorantraniliprole 5 percent) and Radiant 60SC (active ingredient Spinetoram 60 percent), the dosage of the drug as recommended by the manufacturer. The results have identified the combination spray formula Chlorantraniliprole 5 percent + Spinetoram 60 percent, repeated spraying results in the highest fall glue insecticide, eliminating 100 percent of insects on trees after 7 days of spraying and has not caused the effect on the final corn yields.

    References

    Andrews K.L. (1980). The whorlworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in central America and neighboring areas. The Florida Entomologist. 63(4): 456-467.

    Belay K. Difabachew., Randy M. Huckaba. & John E. Foster (2012). Susceptibility of the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera jrugiperda, at Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico, to Different Insecticides. Florida Entomologist. 95(2): 476-478.

    CABI & FAO(2019). Community-Based Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) monitoring, early warning and management.Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International. p. 121.

    Cục Bảo vệ thực vật (2019). Một số biện pháp phòng trừ sâu keo mùa thu gây hại.Truy cập từ https://www.mard.gov.vn/Pages/quy-trinh-ky-thuat-phong-chong-sau-keo-mua-thu.aspx, ngày20/01/2020.

    De Almeida Sarmento R.,De Souza Aguiar R.W. & Vieira S.M.J. (2002). Biology review, occurrence and control of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in corn in Brazil. Bioscience Journal. 18: 41-48.

    Gomez A. Kwanchai (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiley India. 2: 160-161.

    Johnson S.J. (1987). Migration and the life history strategy of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperdain the Western Hemisphere. International journal of Tropical insect Science. 8(4-6): 543-549.

    Sisay B., Tefera T., Wakgari M., Ayalew G. & Mendesil E. (2019). The efficacy of selected synthetic insecticides and botanicals against Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in maize. National Library of Medicine. 10(2): 45.