The Effects of Logistics on Business Performance of the Garment Firms in Hanoi

Received: 10-08-2020

Accepted: 04-11-2020

DOI:

Views

0

Downloads

0

Section:

KINH TẾ XÃ HỘI VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN NÔNG THÔN

How to Cite:

Trang, N., Nui, N., & Thuy, D. (2024). The Effects of Logistics on Business Performance of the Garment Firms in Hanoi. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(12), 1201–1209. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/749

The Effects of Logistics on Business Performance of the Garment Firms in Hanoi

Nguyen Thi Thu Trang (*) 1 , Nguyen Hai Nui 1 , Doan Thi Ngoc Thuy 1

  • 1 Khoa Kế toán và Quản trị kinh doanh, Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam
  • Keywords

    Logistics, business performance, garment enterprise

    Abstract


    The purpose of the study was to identify logistics factors affecting the business performance of garment enterprises in Hanoi city. The survey was conducted on a database of 109 garment enterprises in Hanoi by using the surveying methods (interview by phone, mail, sample interview on google Docs and face-to-face) and face-to-face, the collected data were analyzed by factor analysis (EFA). The results showed that five logistics factor groups had positive effects on garment firms’ performance. The research Model has indicated that using reasonably logistics costs, improving the quality of output logistics. The appropriate recommendations should be simultaneously applied following 6 solutions: (1) Investing in modern facilities and equipment for logistics operations at garment enterprises; (2) Building a close relationship with distribution intermediaries; (3) Managing the plans of input materials; (4) Improving the qualifications and capabilities of logistics staff; (5) Enhancing the enterprise inventory management; (6) Promoting the application of information technology in logistics services.

    References

    Angelisa Elisabeth Gillyard M.S. & M.A. (2003). The relatinonship among Supply chain characteristics, logistics and manufacturing strategies and performance, dissertation. The Ohio State University.

    Comrey A.L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Nguyễn Xuân Hảo (2015). Tác động dịch vụ logistics đến hiệu quả họạt động kinh doanh của các doanh nghiệp sản xuất trên địa bàn tỉnh Quảng Bình. Luận án Tiến sĩ kinh tế, Đại học Kinh tế quốc dân.

    Đặng Đình Đào & Nguyễn Minh Sơn (2012). Phát triển dịch vụ logistics ở nước ta trong tiến trình hội nhập quốc tế. Nhà xuất bản Chính trị Quốc gia, Hà Nội.

    Đoàn Thị Hồng Vân (2010). Logistics những vấn đề cơ bản. Nhà xuất bản Lao động - Xã hội, Hà Nội.

    Nunnally J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory(2nded.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Hoàng Trọng & Chu Nguyễn Mộng Ngọc (2005). Phân tích dữ liệu nghiên cứu với SPSS. Nhà xuất bản Thống kê.

    Morash Edward A., Cornelia L.M. Droge & Shawnee K. Vickery (1996). Strategic Logistics Capabilities for Competitive Advantage and Firm Success. Journal of Business Logistics. 17(1): 1-22.

    Nguyễn Đình Thọ & Nguyễn Thị Mai Trang (2009). Nghiên cứu khoa học trong Quản trị kinh doanh. Nhà xuất bảnThống kê.

    Peterson R.A. (1994). A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha. Journal of Consumer Research. 21: 381-391.

    Rutner S.M. & Langley Jr. C.J. (2000). Logistics value: definition, process and measurement. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 11(2): 73-82.

    Sut Sakchutchawan, Paul C. Hong, Stephen K. Callaway & Anand Kunnathur (2011). Innovation and Competitive Advantage: Model and Implementation for Global Logistics. International Business Research. 4(3): 10-21.

    Saunders M., Lewis P. & Thornhill A. (2012). Resarch Methods for Business Students” 6thedition. Pearson Education Limited.

    Slater S. (1995). Issues in Conducting Marketing Strategy Research. Journal of Strategic Marketing. 3(4): 257-270.

    Tabachnick B.G. & Fidell L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York.

    Tu Yu Long (2008). AnalysisCountermeasure of Enterprise's Logistics Information Construction. Modern Business.2: 34-35