The Relationship between People’s Livelihood Systems and Forest Carbon Stock

Received: 18-08-2014

Accepted: 11-03-2015

DOI:

Views

0

Downloads

0

Section:

TÀI NGUYÊN VÀ MÔI TRƯỜNG

How to Cite:

An, N., & Ha, N. (2024). The Relationship between People’s Livelihood Systems and Forest Carbon Stock. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13(2), 226–234. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/172

The Relationship between People’s Livelihood Systems and Forest Carbon Stock

Ngo The An (*) 1 , Nguyen Thi Bich Ha 1

  • 1 Khoa Môi trường, Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam
  • Keywords

    forest, carbon stock, livelihood

    Abstract


    This study was carrried out to determine the relationship between carbon (C) stock and people’s livelihoods. The analyzed results from 100 questionaires and group discussions at two villages which belong to Con Cuong district, Nghe An province showed that the livelihoods of the local people are very poor. The current land use types with high economic benefits resulted in low C stock. In contrast, the primary forests which arerich in C do not provide high incomes to the farmers. Policies on land management, forest protection, and forest plantation strongly impact people’s livelihoods. Due to the strict forest protection regime and the ban on shifting cultivation, farmer’s incomes have been significantly decreased at the strudy areas. Forest plantations are still financially supported by the government, but only a few better off households can afford to plant trees on their allocated forest land. Diversifying livehoods for local farmers by establishing an agroforestry model of field crops, such as cassava, inter-planted with tree crops such as fruit trees and Acacia sp., while continuing to protect upstream forests, could lead to the increase of C stocks and help poor farmers, but this measuere is only feasible if financial support is provided to the poor households.

    References

    Brown J. and Pearce D. W. (1994). The Economic value of Carbon storage in Tropical forests, in J.Weiss (ed). The Economics of Project Appraisal and the Environment, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 102-123

    Christiansen L. (2006). Land Use Management Projects under the CDM: A Village Case Study of Global and Local Potentials and Consequences. MSc thesis, Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen.

    DFID.(2001). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. Series Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID.

    Felincani-Robles F.(2012). Forest carbon tenure in Asia-Pacific – A comparative analysis of legal trends to define carbon rights in Asia-Parcific. FAO leagal perpers online No. 89 2012.

    Hairiah K, Dewi S, Agus F, Velarde S, Ekadinata A, Rahayu S and van Noordwijk M. (2011). Measuring Carbon Stocks AcrossLand Use Systems: A Manual. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), SEA Regional Office, 154 pages.

    Lestrelin G., Nguyen D.T. (2013). I-REDD+. WP5 Country Report: Vietnam

    Richards, K.R., Stokes, C. (2004). A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research. Climatic Change, 63 (1/2): 1–48.

    UN-REDD. (2011). Technical Manual for Participatory Carbon Monitoring. UN-REDD Vietnam programme.

    Trần Đức Viên, Nguyên Vinh Quang, Mai Văn Thành (2005). Phân cấp trong quản lý tài nguyên rừng và sinh kế người dân. Nhà xuất bản Nông nghiệp, Hà Nội.