Maize Root Development under Hypoxia and Waterlogging Conditions

Received: 27-12-2018

Accepted: 21-03-2019

DOI:

Views

0

Downloads

0

Issue: Vol. 17 No. 1 (2019)

Section:

NÔNG HỌC

How to Cite:

Loc, N., Tuan, P., & Long, N. (2024). Maize Root Development under Hypoxia and Waterlogging Conditions. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 17(1), 11–21. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/535

Maize Root Development under Hypoxia and Waterlogging Conditions

Nguyen Van Loc (*) 1 , Pham Quang Tuan 1 , Nguyen Viet Long 1

  • 1 Khoa Nông học, Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam

    • Keywords

    Waterlogging, hypoxia, root development, maize

    Abstract


    Waterlogging is a major environmental stress limiting maize yield in the monsoonal areas of Asia, as well as in other parts of the world. The objective of this study was to evaluate thephenotypic variation in root development under hypoxia condition at the seedling stageofdiverse maize inbred lines in 0.1% agar-hydroponic culture. The root length (RLD), root surface area (RSAD) and root volume (RVD) under hypoxia wereinvestigated by means of WinRHIZO analysis before and after the treatment. Based on the evaluation results of 30 lines under hypoxia, root development of15 selected lines was also evaluated in soil culture. Significant phenotypic variation in hypoxia tolerance in roots was observed among studiedmaize lines. Root developmentin hydroponic and soil culture wassignificantly correlated. The results suggested that nine potential lines (VNT2, VNT3, VNT7, VNT9, VNT12, VNT13, VNT14, VNT24 và VNT25)hada high ability to develop roots under hypoxia. These resultsprovide insights into the mechanisms of waterlogging adaptation and the hypoxia tolerant materials can be usedto improve the waterlogging tolerance of modernmaizecultivars at the seedling stage.

    References

    Armstrong W. (1980).Aeration in higher plants. Adv Bot Res., 7: 225- 232.

    Armstrong W. &Drew M.C. (2002). Root growth and metabolism under oxygen deficiency. In: Yoav W, Amram E, Uzi K (Eds.) Plant Root: The Hidden Half 3rdedition. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. pp. 729-761.

    Bacanamwo M. &Purcell L.C. (1999).Soybean dry matter and N accumulation responses to flooding stress, N sources, and hypoxia. J Exp Bot.50:689-696.

    Colmer T.D. (2003). Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant Cell Environ,26: 17-36.

    Drew M.C. (1983). Plant injury and adaptation to oxygen deficiency in the root environment: A review. Plant Soil,75: 179-199.

    Henshaw T.L., Gilbert R.A., Scholberg J.M.S., Sinclair T.R. (2007). Soya bean (Glycine maxL. Merr.) genotype response to early-season flooding: I. Root and nodule development. J Agron Crop Sci.,193: 177-188.

    Islam M.R., Hamid A., Khaliq Q.A., Haque M.M., Ahmed J.U. &Karim M.A. (2010). Effects of soil flooding on roots, photosynthesis and water relations in mungbean (Vigna radiata(L.) Wilczek).Bang J Bot.,39:241-243.

    Jitsuyama Y. (2015). Morphological root responses of soybean to rhizosphere hypoxia reflect waterlogging tolerance. Can J Plant Sci., 95: 999-1005.

    Kanwar R.S., Baker J.L. &Mukhtar S. (1988). Excessive soil water effects at various stages of development on the growth and yield of corn. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 31: 133-141.

    Lizaso, J.I. and Ritchie J.T. (1997). Maize shoot and root response to root zone saturation during vegetative growth. Agronomy J.,89: 125-134.

    Meyer W.S., Barrs H.D., Mosier A.R. &Schaefer N.L. (1987). Response of maize to three short-term periods of waterlogging at high and low nitrogen levels on undisturbed and repacked soil. Irrigation Science, 8: 257-272.

    Min M.N., Amiruzzaman M., Ahmed A.&Ali M.R. (2014). Combining ability study in waterlogged tolerant maize (Zeamays L.). Bangladesh J Agril Res., 39: 283-291.

    Miura K.., Ogawa A., Matsushima K. &Morita H. (2012). Root and shoot growth under flooded soil in wild grownut (Glycine Soja) and as a genetic resource of waterlogging tolerance for soybean (Glycine max). J Weed Sci Res., 18: 427-423.

    Mukhtar S., Baker J.L. & Kanwar R.S. (1990). Corn growth as affected by excess soil water. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 33: 437-442.

    Nguyen L.V., TakahashiR., Githiri S.M., Rodriguez T.O., Tsutsumi N., Kajihara S., Sayama T., Ishimoto M., Harada K., Suematsu K., Abiko T.&Mochizuki T. (2017). Mapping quantitative trait loci for root development under hypoxia conditions in soybean (Glycine maxL. Merr.). Theor Applied gen, 130(4): 743-755.

    Nguyễn Văn Lộc, Nguyễn Thế Hùng, Nguyễn Văn Cương, Phạm Quang Tuân&Nguyễn Việt Long (2013). Phản ứng của các dòng ngô thuần trong điều kiện ngập ở thời kỳ cây con. Tạp chí Khoa học và Phát triển, 11(7): 926-932.

    Nguyễn Văn Lộc&Nguyễn Việt Long (2015). Ưu thế lai về đặc tính chịu úng của cây ngô. Tạp chí khoa học và Phát triển,13(5): 694-704.

    Onuegbu B.A. (1997). Screening for flooding tolerance of some ornamental plants. Crop, Soil Forestry Nig J., 3: 29-35.

    Perata P. &Alpi A. (1993). Plant responses to anaerobiosis. Plant Sci., 93: 1-17.

    Rathore T.R., Warsi M.Z.K., Zaidi P.H.&Singh N.N. (1997). Waterlogging problem for maize production in Asia region. TAMNET News Letter, 4: 13-14.

    Sallam A. &Scott H. D. (1987).Effects of prolonged flooding on soybeans during early vegetative growth. Soil Sci., 144: 61-66.

    Shimamura S., Mochizuki T., Nada Y. &Fukuyama M. (2003). Formation and function of secondary aerenchyma in hypocotyl, roots and nodules of soybean (Glycine max) under flooded conditions. Plant Soil, 251: 351-359.

    Shimamura S., Yamamoto R., Nakamura T., Shimada S. &Komatsu S. (2010). Stem hypertrophic lenticels and secondary aerenchyma enable oxygen transport to roots of soybean in flooded soil. Ann Bot., 106: 277-284.

    Souza T.C., Castro E.M., Magalhães P.C., Alves E.T.&Pereira F.J. (2012). Early characterization of maize plants in selection cycles under soil flooding. Plant Breed, 131: 439-501.

    Suematsu K., Abiko T., Nguyen V.L. & Mochizuki T. (2017). Phenotypic variation in root development of 162 soybean accessions under hypoxia condition at the seedling stage. Plant Pro Sci., 20(3): 323-335.

    Thomas A.L., Guerreiro S.M.C &Sodek L. (2005). Aerenchyma formation and recovery from hypoxia of the flooded root system of nodulated soybean. Ann Bot., 96: 1191-1198

    Trought MCT&Drew MC (1980).The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivumL.) I. Shoot and root growth in relation to changes in the concentrations of dissolved gases and solutes in the soil. Plant and Soil, 54: 77-94.

    Visser E.J.W., Colmer T.D., Blom C.W.P.M & Voesenek L.A.C.J. (2000). Changes in growth, porosity, and radial oxygen loss from adventitious roots of selected mono - and dicotyledonous wetland species with contrasting types of aerenchyma. Plant Cell Environ.,23: 1237-1245.

    Wenkert W., Fausey N.R.&Watters H.D. (1981). Flooding responses in Zea maysL. Plant Soil, 62: 351-366.

    Wiengweera A., Greenway H.&Thomson C.J. (1997).The use of agar nutrient solution to simulate lack of convection in waterlogging soils. AnnBot.,80:115-123.

    Yamane K. & Iijima M. (2016). Nodulation control of crack fertilization technique reduced the growth inhibition of soybean caused by short-term waterlogging at early vegetative stage. Plant Prot Sci., 19(3): 438-448.

    YamauchiT., Shimamura S., NakazonoM.&Mochizuki T. (2013). Aerenchyma formation in crop species: A review. Field Crop Res., 152: 8-16.