Heterosis ofAgronomical and Physiological Characteristics Related to Flooding Tolerance in Maize (ZeamaysL.)

Received: 10-11-2014

Accepted: 22-07-2015

DOI:

Views

0

Downloads

0

Section:

NÔNG HỌC

How to Cite:

Loc, N., & Long, N. (2024). Heterosis ofAgronomical and Physiological Characteristics Related to Flooding Tolerance in Maize (ZeamaysL.). Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13(5), 694–704. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/228

Heterosis ofAgronomical and Physiological Characteristics Related to Flooding Tolerance in Maize (ZeamaysL.)

Nguyen Van Loc (*) 1 , Nguyen Viet Long 2, 3, 1

  • 1 Khoa Nông học, Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam
  • 2 Faculty of Agronomy, Vietnam National University of Agriculture
  • 3 Bộ môn Cây lương thực, Khoa Nông học, Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam
  • Keywords

    Maize, heterosis, flooding tolerance, seedling

    Abstract


    This study was conducted to investigatethe heterosis of agronomical traits relating to flooding tolerance in 10 maize hybrids derived from 7 parental inbred lines. The flooding treatments were applied artificially at seedling stage (3 - 4 leaves) in field conditions for one week. There was positive relationship of root length, SPAD value, dry matter accumulation and flooding tolerance ability in maize plant. Positive heterosis was found for SPAD, dry matter accumulation and grain yield under flooding stress conditions. Better growth and higher SPAD value under flooding conditions of D1xD3, D1xD4 and D2xD5 might contribute to the higher yields of these hybrids compared with others.

    References

    Amin M. N., M.Amiruzzaman and M.R. Ali (2014). Combining ability study in waterlogged tolerant maize (Zea mays L.). J. Agril.Res., 39: 283-291.

    Crow J.F. (1998). 90 years: The beginning of hybrid Maize. Gentic.,148: 923-928.

    Kanwar, R.S., J.L. Baker, S. Mukhtar (1988). Excessive soil water effects at various stages of development on the growth and yield of corn. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 31: 133-141.

    Lizaso, J.I., J.T. Ritchie (1997). Maize shoot and root response to root zone saturation during vegetative growth. Agronomy Journal, 89: 125-134.

    Meyer, W.S., H.D. Barrs, A.R. Mosier, N.L. Schaefer (1987). Response of maize to three short-term periods of waterlogging at high and low nitrogen levels on undisturbed and repacked soil. Irrigation Science, 8: 257-272.

    Min M.N., M. Amiruzzaman, A.Ahmed, M.R.Ali (2014). Combining ability study in waterlogged tolerant maize (Zeamays L.). Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture Reasearch, 39: 283-291.

    Mukhtar, S., J.L.Baker, and R.S. Kanwar (1990). Corn growth as affected by excess soil water. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 33: 437-442.

    Nguyễn Văn Lộc, Nguyễn Việt Long, Nguyễn Thế Hùng, Nguyễn Văn Cương và Phạm Quang Tuân (2013). Phản ứng của một số dòng ngô tự phối với điều kiện ngập nước ở thời kỳ cây con. Tạp chí Khoa học và Phát triển, 11(7): 926-932.

    Rathore T.R, M.Z.K Warsi, P.H.Zaidi, N.N. Singh (1997). Waterlogging problem for maize production in Asia region. TAMNET News Letter, 4: 13-14.

    Reif. J.C, A.R. Hallauer, A.E. Melchinger (2005). Heterosis and heterotic patterns in Maize. Maydica, 50: 215-223.

    Sanchez R.A., Trapani N. (1983). Effects of water stress on the chlorophyll content, nitrogen level and photosynthesis of two maize genotypes. Photosynthesis research, 4: 44-47.

    Vũ Đình Hòa, Vũ Văn Liết (2005). Giáo trình chọn giống cây trồng.Nhà xuất bản Đại học Nông nghiệp, tr. 103-104.

    Sayhed C. (2001). Radiation use efficiency response to vapour pressure deficit for maize and sorghum. Field crop research, 56: 265-270.

    Yamauchi T., S. Shimamura, M. Nakazono and T. Mochizuki (2013). Aerencenchyma formation in crop species: A review. Field crop research, 152: 8-16.

    Zaidi, P.H., S. Rafique, P.K. Rai, N.N. Singh and G. Srinivasan (2004). Tolerance to excess moisture in maize (Zea mays L.): Susceptible crop growth stage and identification of tolerant genotypes. Field Crops Res., 90: 189-202.