Characterization of Agronomical and Physiological Traits Related to Nitrogen Fixation of Nodule Bacteria (Rhizobium) in Soybean at Flowering Stage under Waterlogging Conditions

Received: 03-11-2014

Accepted: 04-06-2015

DOI:

Views

0

Downloads

0

Section:

NÔNG HỌC

How to Cite:

Binh, V., & Long, N. (2024). Characterization of Agronomical and Physiological Traits Related to Nitrogen Fixation of Nodule Bacteria (Rhizobium) in Soybean at Flowering Stage under Waterlogging Conditions. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13(4), 485–494. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/205

Characterization of Agronomical and Physiological Traits Related to Nitrogen Fixation of Nodule Bacteria (Rhizobium) in Soybean at Flowering Stage under Waterlogging Conditions

Vu Tien Binh (*) 1 , Nguyen Viet Long 1

  • 1 Khoa Nông học, Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam
  • Keywords

    Flooding, flowering, soybean, nodule bacteria

    Abstract


    A pot experiment was conducted in greenhouse conditions at Viet NamNational University of Agriculture to determine the effects of waterloggingon agronomical and physiological traits related to nitrogen fixation ability of nodule bacteria (Rhizobium) in soybean at the flowering stage. Seeds of each cultivarwere sown in pots containing 6 kg dry soi. When plantstartedflowering, each pot was subjected to flood and maintained 3cm-water for one week at flowering stage. The results showed that the number of nodules and mass of nodules, leaf area, total chlorophyll content, carbon exchange rate, dry matter accumulation, total protein content and individual plant yieldwere significantly reduced underflooding conditions. D140 and D912 varieties showed better growth, recovery and final yield under flooding conditions (4.85 and 4.67 g/plant) while AK03 variety was the most affected by flooding stress(3.55 g/plant).

    References

    Ahmed S., E. Nawata and T. Sakuratami (2002). Effects of waterlogging at vegetative and reproductive growth stage on photosynthesis, leaf water potential and yield in Mungbean. Plant Product. Sci., p. 117-123.

    Ashraf, M. and H. Rehman (1999). Mineral nutrient status of corn in relation to nitrate and long-term waterlogging. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 22: 1253-1268.

    Cho J.W. and T. Yamakawa (2006). Effects on growth and seed yield of small seed soybean cultivars of flooding conditions in paddy field. J.Fac.Agr., Kyushu University, 51(2):189-193.

    Ellis J.R. (1998). Flood syndrome and vesivular Abuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Production Agriculture J., 11: 200-204.

    Grodzinxki A.M và Grodzinxki Đ.M (1981). Sách tra cứu tóm tắt về Sinh lý thự vật (bản dịch). Nhà xuất bản “Mir”-Moxcơva, tr. 468-471.

    Henshaw, T.L., R.A. Gilbert, J.M.S. Scholberg and T.R. Sinclair (2007). Soya bean (Glycine max L. Merr.) genotype response to early-season flooding: II. Aboveground growth and biomass. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 193: 189-197.

    Hoàng Minh Tấn, Nguyễn Quang Thạch, Vũ Quang Sáng (2006). Giáo trình Sinh lí thực vật. Nhà xuất bản Nông nghiệp, Hà Nội, tr. 198-205

    Huang, B., J.W. Johnson, D.S. Nesmith and D.C. Bridges (1994). Growth, physiological and anatomical responses of two wheat genotypes to waterlogging and nutrient supply. J. Exp. Bot., 45: 193-202.

    Joe Lauer, 2008. Flooding impacts on corn growth and yield. Field crop research, 28: 49-56.

    Lakitan, B.1989. Morphological and some physiological responses of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to flooding. PhD Diss., Cornell Univ.

    Malik, A.I., D.T.D. Colmer, H. Lambers and M. Schortemeyer (2001). Changes in physiological and morphological traits of roots and shoots of wheat in response to different depth of waterlogging. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 28: 1121-1131.

    Miura K., A. Ogawa, K. Matsushima and H. Morita (2012). Root and shoot growth under flooded soil in wild grownut (Glycine Soja) and as a genetic resource of waterlogging tolerance for soybean (Glycine max). J. Weed. Sci.Res., p. 427-423.

    Nguyen Viet Long, Oene Dolstra, Marcos Malosetti, Benjamin Kilian, Andreas Graner, Richard G. F. Visser, C. Gerard van der Linden (2013). Association mapping of salt tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical Applied Genetic, 126(9): 2335-2351.

    Pang, J., M. Zhou, N. Mendham and S. Shabala (2004). Growth and physiological responses of six barley genotypes to waterlogging and subsequent recovery. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 55: 895-906.

    Sanchez R.A., Trapani N. (1983). Effects of water stress on the chlorophyll content, nitrogen level and photosynthesis. Photosynthesis research, 4: 44-47.

    Sayhed C. (2001). Radiation use efficiency response to vapour pressure deficit for plant. Field crop research, 56: 265-270

    Singh, B. P., K.A. Tucker, J.D. Sutton and H.L. Bhardwaj (1991). Flooding reduces gas exchange and growth of snap bean. Hort. Science, 26: 372-373.

    Striker, G.G., P. Insausti, A.A. Grimoldi, E.L. Ploschuk and V. Vasellati (2005). Physiological and anatomical basis of differential tolerance to soil flooding of Lotus corniculatus L. and Lotus glaber. Mill. Plant Soil, 276: 301-311.

    Vũ Đình Chính, Đinh Thái Hoàng (2010). Đánh giá khả năng sinh trưởng, phát triển và năng suất của một số giống đậu tương Úc nhập nội trong vụ hè thu trên đất Gia Lâm - Hà Nội, Tạp chí Khoa học và Phát triển, 8(6): 868-875.

    Wadman-van Schravendijk, H., and O.M. van Andel. 1985. Interdependence of growth, water relations and abscisic acid level in Phaseolus vulargaris during waterlogging. Physiol. Plant, 63: 215-220.

    Wesseling, Jans (1974). Crop growth and wet soils. Van Schilfgaarde, Jan (Ed.). Drainage for Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI: 7-37.

    Yamauchi T., S. Shimamura, M. Nakazono and T. Mochizuki (2013). Aerencenchyma formation in crop species: A review. Field crop research, 152: 8-16.

    Zaidi, P.H., S. Rafique, P.K. Rai, N.N. Singh and G. Srinivasan (2004). Tolerance to excess moisture in maize (Zea mays L.): Susceptible crop growth stage and identification of tolerant genotypes. Field Crops Res., 90: 189-202.