REMOVAL OF ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS BY A CARBON ELECTROLYTIC REACTOR

Received: 23-03-2016

Accepted: 31-08-2016

DOI:

Views

2

Downloads

0

Section:

TÀI NGUYÊN VÀ MÔI TRƯỜNG

How to Cite:

Cong, V., Vien, T., & Sakakibara, Y. (2024). REMOVAL OF ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS BY A CARBON ELECTROLYTIC REACTOR. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(10), 1502–1509. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/1479

REMOVAL OF ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS BY A CARBON ELECTROLYTIC REACTOR

Vo Huu Cong (*) 1 , Tran Duc Vien 1 , Yutaka Sakakibara 2

  • 1 Faculty of Environment, Vietnam National University of Agriculture
  • 2 Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Japan
  • Keywords

    Carbon hoạt tính, chất rối loạn nội tiết, điện hoá, hormone môi trường, nước thải

    Abstract


    Water demand for agricultural production has become a crucial factor for sustainable development. With regard to reducing the risk posed by water suppliedfrom irrigation or natural water sources, water reuse and recyclinghave been initiated in many parts of the world, especially where water scarcity is becomingserious due totheimpact of climate change. One of the challenges in water reuse is how to eliminate toxic compounds from agricultural wastewater. This paper demonstrates a method to remove estradiol (E2), an environmental hormone excreted mainly from animal husbandry farms and 2,4 dichlorophenol (DCP), a weed control chemical. The operating conditions for electro-chemical oxidation of estrogens (estrone (E1), E2 and ethynylestradiol (EE2) and 2,4 dichlorophenol (2,4D) were evaluated using synthetic wastewater. The results showedthat although estrogens and DCP oxidized in the range of 0.5-0.8V, the optimal condition for electropolimerization was achieved in alkaline conditions. In addition, the continuous treatments show that more than 80% of removal efficiency was achieved with energy consumption around 1-10 Wh.m-3. It is recommended that further studies using available materialsat local sitesshould be conducted to make this process possible in practice.

    References

    Bard A.J. and Faulkner L. R. (2001). Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Chen G. (2004). Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Separation and Purification Technology, 38(1): 11 - 41.

    Cong V. H. and Sakakibara Y. (2015). Continuous treatments of estrogens through polymerization andregeneration of electrolytic cells. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 285: 304 - 310.

    Duong C. N., Ra J. S., Cho J., Kim S. D., Choi, H. K., Park J. H., Kim K. W., Inam E. and Kim S. D. (2010). Estrogenic chemicals and estrogenicity in river waters of South Korea and seven Asian countries. Chemosphere, 78(3): 286 - 293.

    Duong H. T, Kadokami K, Pan S., Matsuura N. and Nguyen T. Q. (2014). Screening and analysis of 940 organic micro-pollutants in river sediments in Vietnam using an automated identification and quantification database system for GC-MS. Chemosphere, 107: 462 - 472.

    Gan P., Compton R. G., Foord J. S. (2013). The voltammetry and electroanalysis of some estrogenic compounds at modified diamond electrodes. Electroanalysis, 25(11): 2423 - 2434.

    Gattrell M. and Kirk D. (1993). A Study of the Oxidation of Phenol at Platinum and Preoxidized Platinum Surfaces. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 140(6): 1534 - 1540.

    Han J., Qiu W., Hu J., GaoW. (2012). Chemisorption of estrone in nylon microfiltration membranes: Adsorption mechanism and potential use for estrone removal from water. Water Research, 46(3): 873 - 881.

    Hester R. E., Harrison R. M. (1999). Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals, Issues in Environmental Science and Technology. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, UK.

    Kavlock R. J. (1996). Research needs for risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: A review of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop. Environmental Health Perspectives, 104: 715 - 740.

    Lei B., Kang J., Yu Y., Zha J., Li W. and Wang Z. (2013). β-estradiol17-valerate affects embryonic development and sexual differentiation in Japanese medaka (Oryziaslatipes). Aquatic Toxicology, 134 - 135: 12 - 134.

    Li Y. M., Zeng Q. L. and Yang S. J. (2010). Removal and fate of estrogens in an anaerobic-anoxic-oxic activated sludge system. Water Science and Technology, 63(1): 51 - 56.

    Maeng S. K., Choi B. G., Lee K. T. and Song K. G. (2013). Influences of solid retention time, nitrification and microbial activity on the attenuation of pharmaceuticals and estrogens in membrane bioreactors. Water Research, 47(9): 3151 - 3162.

    Murugananthan M., Yoshihara S., Rakuma T., Uehara N. and Shirakashi T. (2007). Electrochemical degradation of 17β-estradiol (E2) at boron-doped diamond (Si/BDD) thin film electrode. ElectrochimicaActa, 52: 3242 - 3249.

    . andSakakibara Y. (2012). Enzymatic degradation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in aquatic plants and relations to biological Fenton reaction. , 66(4): 775-782.

    Richardson S. D. and TernesT. A. (2014). Water analysis: Emerging contaminants and current issues, Anal. Chem., 86: 2813 - 2848.

    Sarkar S., Ali S., Rehmann L., Nakhla G. andRay M.B. (2014). Degradation of estrone in water and wastewater by various advanced oxidation processes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 278: 16 - 24.

    Seki M., Yokota H., Maeda M. and Kobayashi K. (2005). Fish full life-cycle testing for 17β-estradiol on medaka (Oryziaslatipes). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24 (5): 1259 - 1266.

    Tanaka T., Tamura T., Ishizaki Y., Kawasaki A., Kawase T., Teraguchi M. and Taniguchi M. (2009). Enzymatic treatment of estrogens and estrogen glucuronide. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21: 731 - 735.

    Trinh T., van den Akker B., Stuetz R. M., Coleman H. M., Le-Clech P. and Khan S. J. (2012). Removal of trace organic chemical contaminants by a membrane bioreactor. Water Science and Technology, 66(9): 1856 - 1863.

    Zhou Y., Huang X., Zhou H., Chen J. and Xue W. (2011). Removal of typical endocrine disrupting chemicals by membrane bioreactor: in comparison with sequencing batch reactor. Water Science and Technology, 64(10): 2096 - 2102.