Received: 27-07-2023
Accepted: 05-01-2024
DOI:
Views
Downloads
How to Cite:
Assessment of IBDV Antibody Titer and Productivity of Commercial Broiler Chicken at Field Trial Post-Vaccination with Tabic MB and IBDV-Icx
,
Nguyen Thi Kieu Oanh
2
,
Nguyen Manh Ho
2
,
Nguyen Thi Van Anh
1
,
Quach Tuyet Anh
2
Keywords
Gumboro, live vaccine, immune complex vaccine
Abstract
The study was conducted to evaluate antibody titers against IBDV and the productivity of commercial broiler flocks at field trial vaccinated with live vaccine Tabic MB and immune complex vaccine (IBDV-Icx). A total of 240 blood samples were randomly collected from 2 farms to test antibody titers against IBDV by ELISA technique. Mean body weight, average daily weight gain, and FCR were monitored until slaughter. The results showed that the chickens had high level of maternally derived antibodies (MDA). At 3 days old, the mean MDA was 5,582 titer units. At 30 days old, the number of positive samples with anti-IBDV (> 396 titers) in the group using Tabic MB and IBDV-Icx vaccines was 20% and 5%, respectively (P <0.05). Especially at 35 days of age, the titer at farm using the Tabic MB vaccine was 2,671 , which was significantly higher than that of the farm using the IBD-Icx vaccine, with titer of 132 only (P <0.05). Chicken body weight and average daily weight gain of this survey were similar (P >0.05). However, the FCR of chickens using Tabic MB vaccine was lower than chickens using IBDV-Icx vaccine (P <0.05). Briefly, commercial broiler chickens using Tabic MB vaccine had higher antibody titer against IBDV and productivity parameters were not affected compared with vaccinated with IBDV-Icx .
References
Ashash U., Noach C., Perelman B., Costello C., Sansalone P., Brazil T. & Raviv Z. (2019). In Ovo and Day of Hatch Application of a Live Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Vacxin to Commercial Broilers. Avian Diseases, 63(4): 713. doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-19-00087
Berg T.P., Gonze M. & Meulemans G. (1991). Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: Isolation and characterization of a highly virulent strain. Avian Pathology: Journal of the W.V.P.A. 20(1): 133-143. doi.org/10.1080/03079459108418748.
Berg T.P.V.D. (2000). Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: A review. Avian Pathology, 29(3): 175-194. doi.org/10.1080/03079450050045431.
Chansiripornchai N. & Sasipreeyajan J. (2009). Comparison of the Efficacy of the Immune Complex and Conventionally Live Vacxin in Broilers against Infectious Bursal Disease Infection. The Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 39(2): 115-120. doi.org/10.56808/2985-1130.2163.
Cosgrove A.S. (1962). An Apparently New Disease of Chickens: Avian Nephrosis. Avian Diseases. 6(3): 385. doi.org/10.2307/1587909.
De Wit J.J., Heijmans J.F., Mekkes D.R. & Van Loon A.A. (2001). Validation of five commercially available ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus (serotype 1). Avian Pathology: Journal of the W.V.P.A. 30(5): 543-549. doi.org/10.1080/03079450120078743.
Dey S., Upadhyay C., Madhan Mohan C., Kataria J.M. & Vakharia V.N. (2009). Formation of subviral particles of the capsid protein VP2 of infectious bursal disease virus and its application in serological diagnosis. Journal of Virological Methods. 157(1): 84-89. doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.11.020.
Eterradossi N. & Saif Y.M. (2013). Infectious Bursal Disease. In Diseases of Poultry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 219-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421481.ch7.
Ignjatovic J., Gould G., Trinidad L. & Sapats S. (2006). Chicken recombinant antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus are able to form antibody-virus immune complex. Avian Pathology: Journal of the W.V.P.A. 35(4): 293-301. doi.org/10.1080/03079450600823378.
Jeon W.J., Lee H.J., Roh I.S., Yoon Y.S., Kim J.H. & Choi K.S. (2017). Effect of maternally derived antibody on sequential infection with highly virulent bursal disease virus in newly hatched broilers. Poultry Science. 96(12): 4193-4199. doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex230.
Kreider D.L., Skeeles J.K., Parsley M., Newberry L.A. & Story J.D. (1991). Variability in a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system. II. Laboratory variability. Avian Diseases. 35(2): 288-293.
Legese L., Wakjira B., Teshome T., Woldemichael D.N., Waktole H., Regassa F. & Tufa T.B. (2022). Comparative Immunogenicity Evaluation of Two Infectious Bursal Disease Vacxins Commonly Used in Broiler Chickens in Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports. 13: 31-38. doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S346659.
Müller H., Islam M.R. & Raue R. (2003). Research on infectious bursal disease - The past, the present and the future. Veterinary Microbiology. 97(1-2): 153-165. doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.08.005.
Nguyễn Thị Kiều Oanh, Nguyễn Mạnh Hổ, Nguyễn Văn Đồng & Quách Tuyết Anh (2022a). Đánh giá độ an toàn và hiệu quả của vắc-xin nhược độc phòng bệnh Gumboro khi áp dụng cho gà con mới nở tại trạm ấp. Tạp chí Nông nghiệp và Phát triển. 21(2): Article 2. doi.org/10.52997/jad.4.02.2022.
Nguyễn Thị Kiều Oanh, Nguyễn Mạnh Hổ & Quách Tuyết Anh (2022b). Efficacy of live attenuated MB-1 vaccine against infectious bursal disease in Isa Brown at field trial. The 4th international conference on sustainable agriculture and environment. Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. 17-19 November 2022.138 – 147. ISBN: 978-604-73-9420-3
Nguyễn Thị Kiều Oanh, Nguyễn Thị Thúy Nga & Quách Tuyết Anh (2023). Đánh giá đáp ứng miễn dịch của hai loại vaccine nhược độc chủng M.B. phòng bệnh Gumboro trên gà ác. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học cần Thơ, 59(2), Article 2.
Quách Tuyết Anh, Lê Thanh Hiền, Nguyễn Mạnh Hổ & Lê Trần Thái Anh (2018). Field assessment of the efficacy of M.B., LIBDV, and Winterfield 2512 strain vacxins against infectious bursal disease in chickens. Tạp chí Nông nghiệp và Phát triển. 17(6): Article 6. doi.org/10.52997/jad.3.06.2018.
Rautenschlein S., Kraemer C., Vanmarcke J. & Montiel E. (2005). Protective efficacy of intermediate and intermediate plus infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vacxins against very virulent IBDV in commercial broilers. Avian Diseases. 49(2): 231-237. doi.org/10.1637/7310-112204R.
Ray S.M., Ashash U. & Muthukumar S. (2021). A field study on the evaluation of day-of-hatch and in grow-out application of live infectious bursal disease virus vacxin in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 100(8): 101252. doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101252.
Sedeik M.E., El-Shall N.A., Awad A.M., Abd El-Hack M.E., Alowaimer A.N. & Swelum A.A. (2019). Comparative Evaluation of HVT-IBD Vector, Immune Complex, and Live IBD Vacxins against vvIBDV in Commercial Broiler Chickens with High Maternally Derived Antibodies. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI. 9(3): E72. doi.org/10.3390/ani9030072.
Singh N.K., Dey S., Madhan Mohan C., Mohan Kataria J. & Vakharia V.N. (2010). Evaluation of four enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of antibodies to infectious bursal disease in chickens. Journal of Virological Methods. 165(2): 277-282. doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.02.008.
Spackman E., Stephens C.B. & Pantin-Jackwood M.J. (2018). The Effect of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus-Induced Immunosuppression on Vaccination Against Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus. Avian Diseases. 62(1): 36-44. doi.org/10.1637/11769-110717-Reg.1.
Van den Berg T.P., Eterradossi N., Toquin D. & Meulemans G. (2000). Infectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease). Revue Scientifique Et Technique (International Office of Epizootics): 19(2): 509-543.
Zachar T., Popowich S., Goodhope B., Knezacek T., Ojkic D., Willson P., Ahmed K.A. & Gomis S. (2016). A 5-year study of the incidence and economic impact of variant infectious bursal disease viruses on broiler production in Saskatchewan, Canada. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 80(4): 255-261.