Ngày nhận bài: 09-10-2015
Ngày duyệt đăng: 04-01-2016
DOI:
Lượt xem
Download
Cách trích dẫn:
Bổ sung dầu và nitơ phi protein vào khẩu phần để giảm phát thải khí mêtan của bò sinh trưởng
,
Dang Vu Hoa
2
,
Pham Kim Dang
1
,
Nguyen Ngọc Bang
1
,
Nguyen Xuan Trach
1
Từ khóa
Calcium nitrate, growing cattle, methane emission, sunflower oil
Tóm tắt
A two factorial experiment was carried out in three months (June to August, 2012) at the experimental station of Viet Nam National University of Agriculture to determine the effect of dietary supplementation with four different levels of sunflower oil (SFO) and two different kinds of non-protein nitrogen (NPN) on enteric methane emissions and performance of growing cattle. Twenty-four growing Lai Sind cattle (170 kg on average) were randomly divided into 8 blocks corresponding to 8 diets. Each diet includes 2% NaOH-treated rice straws and cassava leaf meal (1% BW - body weight, dry matter basis) as a basal diet supplemented with one of four SFO levels (1.5%, 3.0%, 4.5%, 6.0%) in combination with 4% calcium nitrate or 1.5% urea as NPN source supplement. Methane emissions was determined by using CH4 to CO2 ratio method. Results showed that methane emissions intensity (l/kg DMI - dry matter intake) was reduced by 26% when using nitrate supplement instead of urea supplement. The increase in oil level in the diet nonlinearly reduced methane emissions. The best level of SFO supplement was 3.0%. However, the best dietary treatment was supplementation with 4% calcium nitrate and 1.5% SF oil. It was also shown that the estimated energy losses as CH4 emissions from the experiment diet ranged from 5-8% gross energy intake, compared with around 12% potential energy loss from diet without supplement. In conclusion, it is suggested that the diets of growing cattle should be supplemented with 4% calcium nitrate and 1.5% oil to mitigate methane emissions.
Tài liệu tham khảo
AscensãoA. M. D. (2010). Effects of nitrate and additional effect of probiotic on methane emissions and dry matter intake in Nellore bulls. Universidadede Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro Departamentode Zootecnia.
BeaucheminK. A., KreuzerF. O. and McAllister T. A. (2008). Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 48:21-27.
BenchaarC., PomarC. and ChiquetteJ. (2001). Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modelling approach. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 81:563-574.
BrouwerE. (1965). Report of subcommittee on constants and factors. Proc. 3rd EAAP Symp. onEnergy metabolism.pp. 441-443. Troon, Publ. 11, Academic Press, London
FaverdinP., M’HamedD., Rico-gomezM. and VéritéR. (2003). La nutrition azote´einfluence l’ingestionchez la vachelaitière. INRA Production Animale, 16:27-37.
Giger-ReverdinS., SauvantD., VermorelM. and JouanyJ. P. (2000). Empirical modelling of methane losses from ruminants, 7:187-190.
HaqueM.N., Cornou, C., Madsen, J., (2014). Estimation of methane emission using the CO2method from dairy cows fed concentrate with different carbohydrate compositions in automatic milking system. Livestock Science,164: 57-66.
HuhtanenP., Cabezas-Garcia, E.H., Utsumi, S., Zimmerman, S.(2015). Comparison of methods to determine methane emissions from dairy cows in farm conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 3394-3409.
Hoover W. H. and Stokes S. R. (1991). Balancing carbohydrates and proteins for optimum rumen microbial yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 74:3630-3644.
Johnson I. R., Chapman D. F., Snow V. O., EckardR. J., Parsons A. J., Lambert M. G. and Cullen B. R. (2008). DairyModand EcoMod: Biophysical pastoral simulation models for Australia and New Zealand. Aust. J. Exper. Agric., 48: 621-631.
Johnson K. A., and Johnson D. E., (1995). Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2483-2492.
Johnson K. A., Kincaid R. L., WestbergH. H., Gaskins C. T., Lamb B. K. and CronrathJ. D. (2002). The effects of oil seeds in diets of lactating cows on milk production and methane emissions. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 1509-1515.
LengR. A. (2008). The potential of feeding nitrate to reduce enteric methane production in ruminants. A Report of TheDepartment of Climate Change, Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra ACT, Australia
MachmullerA., OssowskiD. A. and KreuzerM. (2000). Comparative evaluation of the effects of coconut oil, oilseeds and crystalline fat on methane release, digestion and energy balance in lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 85: 41-60.
Madsen J., BjergB. S., HvelplundT., WeisbjergM. R., and Lund P. (2010). Methane and carbon dioxide ratio in excreted air for quantification of the methane production from ruminants. Livestock Sci., 129:223-227.
Moe P. W. and Tyrrell H. F. (1979). Methane production in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 62:1583-1586.
McGinn S. M., BeaucheminK. A., Coates T.andColombattoD. (2004) Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaricacid. J. Anim. Sci., 82(11):3346-3356.
UngerfeldE. M. and Kohn, R. A. (2006).The role of thermodynamics in the control of ruminal fermentation. Pages 55-85inK. Sejrsen, T. Hvelplund, and M. O. Nielsen, eds. Ruminant physiology: Digestion, metabolism and impact of nutrition ongeneexpression, immunology and stress. WageningenAcademic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
USEPA (2000) Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990-2020, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
Zhou Z., MengQ. and Yu Z. (2011).Effects of methanogenicinhibitorson methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro ruminal cultures. Appl. Eviron. Microbiol.,77: 2634-2639.