In vitropropagation of Taiwanese Sweet Mulberry

Received: 26-07-2018

Accepted: 03-12-2018

DOI:

Views

2

Downloads

0

Issue: Vol. 16 No. 8 (2018)

Section:

KỸ THUẬT VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ

How to Cite:

Anh, N., Thiet, N., Luyen, T., Nhan, D., & Han, N. (2024). In vitropropagation of Taiwanese Sweet Mulberry. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16(8), 772–780. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/494

In vitropropagation of Taiwanese Sweet Mulberry

Nguyen Thi Ly Anh (*) 1, 2 , Nguyen Thi Thiet 2 , Tran Thi Luyen 2 , Dang Thi Nhan 2 , Nguyen Thi Han 1

  • 1 Viện Sinh học Nông nghiệp,Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam
  • 2 Khoa Công nghệ Sinh học

    • Keywords

    Sweet mulberry, in vitropropagation, Buffalo head 502, BA, IBA

    Abstract


    In vitropropagation of Taiwanese sweet mulberry was carried out to determine technical parametersinthe production of high quality planting materialsfor expanding cultivated area of the newly introducedfruit tree. One-month-old shoots of two-year-old Taiwanese sweet mulberry plantswere used as initial materialsfor in vitroculture. Results showed that BA at the concentration of 3mg/l in MS medium was suitable for stimulating in vitroshoots from stem nodes with highrate(83.33%). BA at 3 mg/l in combination with0.5 mg/l IBA and 10% coconut water gave the best shoot multiplication rate (2.93 shoots/explant) and the highest shoot quality after 4 weeks of culture. The highest rooting percentage at 96.67% of shoots was observed after 4 weeks onMS medium containing 0.5 mg/l IBA. The plantlets were successfully acclimated in sandy substrate with a survival rate of 80%. The liquid fertilizer “Buffalo Head 502” foliar spary 1 time/weekyielded good quality plantlets suitable for transplanting into pots.This in vitropropagation process is highly effective and easy to apply at production scale.

    References

    Ahmad, P., S. Sharma and P.S. Srivastava (2007). In vitro selection of NaHCO3tolerant cultivars of Morus alba (Local and Sujanpur) in response to morphological and biochemical parameters. Hort. Sci., 34: 114-122.

    Akram, M. and F. Aftab (2012). Efficient micropropagation and rooting of king white mulberry (Morus macroura Miq.) var. laevigata from nodal explants of mature tree.Pak. J. Bot., 44: 285-289.

    Anis M., M. Faisal and S.K. Singh (2003). Micropropagation of mulberry (Morus alaba L.) through in vitro culture of shoot tip and nodal explants. Plant Tissue Cult., 13: 47-51.

    Balakrishnan V., M.R. Latha, K.C. Ravindran and J.P. Robinson (2009). Clonal Propagation of Morus alba L. through nodal and axillary bud explants. Bot. Res. Intl., 2: 42-49.

    Bhau B.S. and A.K. Wakhlu (2003). Rapid micropropagation of five cultivars of mulberry. Biol. Plant, 46: 349-355.

    Đặng Quang Bích, Nguyễn Thị Phương Thảo, Trần Văn Phú, Đinh Trường Sơn, Ninh Thị Thảo, Nguyễn Văn Huấn, Trần Văn Lin, Nguyễn Thị Thùy Linh (2017). Quy trình nhân giống in vitro cây trà hoa vàng (Camellia sp.). Tạp chí Khoa học nông nghiệp Việt nam, 12: 1657-1669.

    Bộ Y tế (2015). Các chất khử khuẩn được sử dụng trong y tế. Phụ lục kèm theo Quyết định số 4290/QĐ-BYT, ngày 15/10/2015.

    Chattopadhyay S., S.G. Doss, S. Halder, A.K. Ali and A.K. Bajpai (2011). Comparative micropropagation efficiency of diploid and triploid mulberry (Morus alba cv. S1) from axillary bud explants. Afr. J. Biotech, 10: 18153-18159.

    Chitra D.S.V. and G. Padmaja (2005). Shoot regeneration via direct organogenesis from in vitro derived leaves of mulberry using thidiazuron and 6-benzylaminopurine. Sci. Hort., 106: 593-602.

    Gamborg O.L. and Philip G.C. (1995). Plant cell, tissue and organ culture. Pub. Springer, pp.37-39

    George E. F., M. A. Hall, Geert-Jan De Klerk (2008). Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. 3rd Edition.Pub. Springer, 1: 205-226.

    Nông Thị Huệ, Phạm Thị Thu Hằng, Tưởng Thị Thanh Huyền, Nguyễn Thị Thùy Linh, Nguyễn Thị Lâm Hải, Nguyễn Thanh Hải (2017). Nghiên cứu nhân giống in vitrocây dâu tây giống SMiA nhập nội từ Mỹ. Tạp chí Khoa học nông nghiệp Việt nam, 12: 1670-1679.

    Kobayashi H., Morisaki N., Tago Y., Hashimoto Y., Iwasaki S., Kawachi E., Nagata R., Shudo K. (1995). Identification of a major cytokinin in coconut milk. Experentia, 51(11): 1081-1084.

    Lalitha, N., S. Kih, R. Banerjee, S. Chattopadhya, A.K. Saha and B.B. Bindroo (2013). High frequency multiple shoot induction and invitro regeneration of mulberry (Morus indica L. cv. S-1635). Int. J. Adv. Res., 1: 22-26.

    Mustafa Yildiz, S. Fatih Ozcan, Cansu T. Kahramanogullari, Ege Tuna(2012). The Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite Solutions on the Viability and In Vitro Regeneration Capacity of the Tissue.The Natural Products Journal, 2(4): 328-331.

    Murashige T., Skoog F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth bioassynwith tobacco tissue cultures. Physiology Plant, 15: 473-479.

    Pierik R.L.M. (1997). In vitroCulture of Higher Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.67-94.

    Sajeevan R.S., S.Jeba Singh, K.N. Nataraja and M.B. Shivanna (2011). An efficient in vitroprotocol for multiple shoot induction in mulberry, Morus alba L. variety V1. Intl. Res.J. Plant. Sci., 2: 254-261.

    Trần Khắc Thi (2014). Kỹ thuật trồng dâu siêu ngọt. http://agriviet.com/threads/giong-cay-dau-qua-dai-dai-loan

    Vijayan K., P. Jayarama Raju, A. Tikader and B. SaratchnadraVijayan, K., A. Tikader and A.J.T. Da Silva (2014).Biotechnology of mulberry (MorusL.) - A review. J. Food Agric., 26(6): 472-496.

    Zaki M., Z.A. Kaloo and M. Sofi(2011). Micropropagation of Morus nigra L. from nodal segments with axillary buds. World J. Agri. Sci., 7: 496-503.