Effects of Collection Frequency and Duration of Storage on Semen Quality of Hac Phong Chickens

Received: 12-12-2022

Accepted: 02-03-2023

DOI:

Views

0

Downloads

0

Issue: Vol. 21 No. 2 (2023)

Section:

NÔNG HỌC

How to Cite:

Doanh, B., Giang, N., Yen, D., Giang, N., Phuong, N., & Dang, P. (2024). Effects of Collection Frequency and Duration of Storage on Semen Quality of Hac Phong Chickens. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(2), 161–168. http://testtapchi.vnua.edu.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/1111

Effects of Collection Frequency and Duration of Storage on Semen Quality of Hac Phong Chickens

Bui Huy Doanh (*) 1 , Nguyen Thi Phuong Giang 1 , Dinh Thi Yen 1 , Nguyen Thi Chau Giang 1 , Nguyen Thi Phuong 1 , Pham Kim Dang 1

  • 1 Khoa Chăn nuôi, Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam

    • Keywords

    Semen quality, preservation, temperature

    Abstract


    This study was conducted to evaluate the semen quality of Hac Phong chickens raised at the Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam National University of Agriculture. In the first experiment, a total of 30 semen samples from 6 Hac Phong roosters were collected in two frequencies, i.e., every day and every three days. Semen characteristics included semen volume, sperm concentration, motility, and abnormal sperm percentage. In the second experiment, rooster semen wasstored in two different media A and B at 5C. Studied parameters were tested after 8 and 24 hours of storage. The results showed that semen volume, sperm concentration, and sperm motility were higher if semen was collected every three days (P <0.05). The percentage of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa was higher if semen was collected every day (P <0.05), however, other criteria did not differ (P >0.05). When rooster semen waspreserved at 5C, the motility rate decreased from 65.38%at 8 hours to 49.84% after 24 hours of storage in medium A and from66.64%at 8 hours to 52.02% after 24 hours of storage in medium B. There was no difference in semen quality between the two media A and B (P >0.05). In both extenders, when the duration of storage was extended from 8 to 24 hours, the sperm motility decreased (P <0.05).

    References

    Al-Bulushi S., Manjunatha B.M., Bathgate R., Rickard J.P. & De Graaf S.P. (2018). Effect of semen collection frequency on the semen characteristics of dromedary camels. Anim Reprod Sci. 197: 145-153.

    Arifiantini R.I., Purwantara B., Yusuf T.I. & Sajuthi D. (2010). Effect of different cryoprotective agents on skim milk and dimitropoulus extender for stallion semen cryopreservation. J Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture.35(1).

    Blesbois E. & Brillard J.P. (2007). Specific features of in vivo and in vitro sperm storage in birds. animal. 1(10): 1472-1481.

    Blesbois E., Grasseau I., Seigneurin F., Mignon-Grasteau S., Saint Jalme M. & Mialon-Richard M.M. (2008). Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology. 69(2): 252-61.

    Bùi Hữu Đoàn, Hoàng Anh Tuấn, Đào Lệ Hằng& Nguyễn Hoàng Thịnh (2016). Ảnh hưởng của phương pháp thụ tinh đến năng suất sinh sản của gà Hồ Tạp chí KHNN Việt Nam. 14(5): 727-733.

    Cantanhêde L.F., Freitas E.N.d., Barros T.B., Guimarães D.B., Dias A.V. & Toniolli R. (2018). Use of alternative extender added of fructose aiming the cryopreservation of boar semen. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science. 55(1): 1-10.

    Du Plessis S.S., Agarwal A., Mohanty G. & Van Der Linde M. (2015). Oxidative phosphorylation versus glycolysis: what fuel do spermatozoa use? Asian J Androl. 17(2): 230-5.

    Khongsen M., Niyomdecha A., Boongaew P., Trimanee S. & Komsong V. (2015). Effect of Frequency of Semen Collection in Dang Cocks and Betong Cocks (Thai Native Chicken). KHON KAEN AGR. J. 43: 216-219.

    Lake P.E. (1960). Studies on the dilution and storage of fowl semen. J Reprod Fertil. 1: 30-5.

    Lê Thanh Phương, Phạm Ngọc Du & Nguyễn Thiết (2021). Phẩm chất tinh dịch và tỷ lệ trứng có phôi, tỷ lệ ấp nở của hai dòng gà trống Nòi. Tạp chí KHKT Chăn nuôi. 263: 47-52.

    Lê Thị Thắm, Đỗ Văn Thu, Đoàn Việt Bách, Trịnh Xuân Khôi, Lê Thị Huệ, Ngô Xuân Thái & Đặng Vũ Bình (2017). Đánh giá chất lượng tinh và thụ tinh nhân tạo cho gà Đông Tảo. Tạp chí Khoa học Nông nghiệp Việt Nam. 15(6): 755-763.

    Nguyễn Hoài Nam, Nguyễn Thị Mai Thơ, Trịnh Thị Phương Thảo, Nhâm Thúy Quỳnh, lê Quang Hải, Nông Văn Thượng, Cao Thị Mỹ Hạnh & Nguyễn Thị Nhiên (2012). Một số chỉ tiêu chất lượng tinh dịch gà Ri khai thác bằng phương pháp mát xa. Tạp chí KHPT. 10(3): 433-437.

    Nguyễn Thị Phương Giang, Nguyễn Thị Châu Giang, Nguyễn Văn Thông, Nguyễn Thị Vinh & Phạm Kim Đăng (2022). Đặc điểm ngoại hình và khả năng sinh trưởng của gà Hắc Phong. Tạp chí Khoa học Nông nghiệp Việt Nam. 20(6): 722-731.

    Partyka A. & Niżański W. (2022). Advances in storage of poultry semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 246: 106921.

    Paulenz H., Grevle I., Tverdal A., Hofmo P. & Berg K.A. (1995). Precision of the Coulter® Counter for Routine Assessment of Boar-sperm Concentration in Comparison with the Haemocytometer and Spectrophotometer. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 30(3): 107-111.

    Peters S.O., Shoyebo O.D., Ilori B.M., Ozoje M.O., Ikeobi C.O.N. & Adebambo O.A.J.I.J.o.P.S. (2008). Semen Quality Traits of Seven Strain of Chickens Raised in the Humid Tropics. International Journal of Poultry Science7: 949-953.

    Phạm Công Thiếu, Nguyễn Viết Nguyên, Dương Trí Tuấn, Nguyễn Quyết Thắng, Văn Thị Chiều, Vũ Đình Trọng, Mai Thu Hương, Nguyễn Văn Duy, Lê Thị Bình & Phạm Hải Ninh (2018). Chọn lọc đàn hạt nhân gà Hắc Phong. Tạp chí Khoa học Công nghệ Chăn nuôi. 85: 37.

    Pruneda A., Pinart E., Dolors Briz M., Sancho S., Garcia-Gil N., Badia E., Kádár E., Bassols J., Bussalleu E., Yeste M. & Bonet S. (2005). Effects of a high semen-collection frequency on the quality of sperm from ejaculates and from six epididymal regions in boars. Theriogenology. 63(8): 2219-32.

    Rakha B.A., Ansarib M.S., Hussaina I., Maqsood, Anwara, Akhterb S. & Blesbois E. (2016). Comparison of extenders for liquid storage of Indian Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus murghi) spermatozoa. Avian Biology Research. 9(3): 207-212.

    Rakha B.A., Hussain I., Akhter S., Ullah N., Andrabi S.M. & Ansari M.S. (2013). Evaluation of Tris-citric acid, skim milk and sodium citrate extenders for liquid storage of Punjab Urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis) spermatozoa. Reprod Biol. 13(3): 238-42.

    Rasad S.D. & Simanjuntak L.C. (2009). The Effect of Fructose Addition in Semen Extender on Quality of Separation of Garut Ram Sperm in Several Storage Length. Animal Production. 11.

    Riaz A., Aleem M., Ijaz A., Saeed M.A. & Latif A. (2004). Effect of collection frequency on the semen quality of broiler breeder. Br Poult Sci. 45(6): 823-827.

    Shaheen M.S., Aslam S., Mehmood S., Tariq M., Abbas Y., Ashfaq H. & Ahmad S. (2022). Effects of age, body weight, semen collection frequency and holding duration on semen traits of broiler breeder reared under different housing systems. Trop Anim Health Prod. 55(1): 21.

    Siudzińska A. & Łukaszewicz E. (2008). Effect of Semen Extenders and Storage Time on Sperm Morphology of Four Chicken Breeds. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 17(1): 101-108.

    Tesfay H.H., Sun Y., Li Y., Shi L., Fan J., Wang P., Zong Y., Ni A., Ma H., Mani A.I. & Chen J. (2020). Comparative studies of semen quality traits and sperm kinematic parameters in relation to fertility rate between 2 genetic groups of breed lines. Poult Sci. 99(11): 6139-6146.

    Tselutin K., Narubina L., Mavrodina T. & Tur B. (1995). Cryopreservation of poultry semen. Br Poult Sci. 36(5): 805-11.